Skip to content
  • beauty
  • cleaning
  • industrial

Oct-1-en-3-yl acetate

CAS 2242-10-6 · 70/100 · High conf.

Also registered as 3 other CAS numbers

74072-82-5 · 1629672-62-3 · 2442-10-6

Oct-1-en-3-yl acetate chemical structure

Concern score

70/100High concern based on regulatory listings.
High confidence

Oct-1-en-3-yl acetate in plain language

What it is

On cosmetic ingredient lists it appears as “Amylvinylcarbinyl acetate”.

Also known as Amylvinylcarbinyl acetate · 1-OCTEN-3-YL acetate · Amylvinylcarbinyl acetate; 1-Octen-3-yl acetate · 1-OCTEN-3-OL, 3-ACETATE · 1-OCTENE-3-OL acetate · 1-Octen-3-Yl Acetatecetate

Show all 18 names

1-Octen-3-ol, acetate · 1-Octenyl-3-acetate · 1-PENTYLALLYL acetate · 3-Acetoxy-1-octene · 3-Acetoxyoctene · Amyl crotonyl acetate · Amyl vinyl carbinol acetate · Amyl vinyl carbinyl acetate · Octenyl acetate · Pentyl crotonyl acetate · Pentyl vinyl carbinol acetate · acetic acid oct-1-en-3-yl ester

What it does

Used in cosmetics as a fragrance ingredient.

  • Perfuming
  • Fragrance
  • Flavouring
Is it a concern?
High concern: no hazard classifications on record. It is restricted in EU cosmetics.

Why it's flagged

Amylvinylcarbinyl acetate; 1-Octen-3-yl acetate is restricted in cosmetic products under Annex III of the EU Cosmetics Regulation (EC) 1223/2009.

RestrictedEU EC — restricted

The score describes this ingredient's chemical identity — its hazard profile from published classifications and regulatory status — not the safety of any product it appears in.

Regulation

Restrictions first, then routine listings from published regulatory sources.

  • EU Annex III — restricted
  • EU restricted in cosmetics

Recorded in these product areas

  • Found in consumer products
  • Cleaning
  • Industrial
  • EUEC

    Annex III of EU Cosmetics Regulation (EC) 1223/2009: substances which cosmetic products must not contain except subject to the restrictions laid down. Product types: (a) Oral products (b) Other products Maximum concentration: (b) 0.3%

    restricted
    View source →
  • EUCosIngActive2 entries
  • USEPAcommercial use observed2 entries
    • EPA CPDat observed this chemical in 0 composition records across product categories including unclassified products.Source →
    • EPA CPDat observed this chemical in 18 composition records across product categories including Cleaning products and household care. EPA CPDat classifies this chemical for functional uses including Fragrance, Flavouring and nutrient.Source →
  • USFDAlisted in openFDA substanceopenFDA substance registry classifies this ingredient as chemical.
    • openFDA substance registry classifies this ingredient as chemical.Source →

Expert safety opinions

No expert opinion on file for Oct-1-en-3-yl acetate. These are the independent scientific bodies that assess ingredients like this one; we show an opinion only when a record we hold cites it.

  • SCCS

    EU Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety

    No SCCS opinion on file.

  • CIR

    Cosmetic Ingredient Review (US expert panel)

    No CIR safety assessment on file.

Evidence & sources

No graded research studies for Oct-1-en-3-yl acetate yet. This record is compiled from the published data sources below — registries and regulatory listings, not study findings.

7 data sources

Where this comes from

  • CosIng

    regulatory · updated 2026-09-23

    Open →
  • EU CosIng Cosmetics Regulation Annexes

    regulatory · updated 2013-05-23

    Open →
  • EPA Chemical and Products Database

    exposure · updated 2020-02-13

    Open →
  • EPA DSSTox Identifiers

    chemistry · updated 2025-12-29

    Open →
  • FDA GSRS UNII

    registry · updated 2026-02-26

    Open →
  • openFDA Substance

    registry · updated 2026-05-24

    Open →
  • PubChem Live Enrichment

    chemistry · updated 2026-05-17

    Open →

Suitability

Context-specific fit derived from published classifications and the current ingredient evidence profile.

Fragrance avoidance

Not a strong fit for fragrance avoidance because it carries Fragrance.

Avoid

The ingredient itself is a fragrance-linked signal, so it is better treated as an avoid case when fragrance exposure is the main concern.