Skip to content
  • food

1,2,3-Propanetriol, homopolymer, (9Z,12R)-12-hydroxy-9-octadecenoate

CAS 68936-89-0 · 40/100 · High conf.

Concern score

40/100Moderate concern based on regulatory listings.
High confidence

1,2,3-Propanetriol, homopolymer, (9Z,12R)-12-hydroxy-9-octadecenoate in plain language

What it is

Also known as Polyglycerol polyricinoleate · 12-Hydroxyoctadec-9-enoic acid--propane-1,2,3-triol (1/1)

What it does

We don't have a plain-language description for 1,2,3-Propanetriol, homopolymer, (9Z,12R)-12-hydroxy-9-octadecenoate yet.

Is it a concern?
Moderate concern: no hazard classifications on record.

Why it's flagged

EPA DSSTox provides the canonical identifier, structure, and synonym profile for this chemical.

The score describes this ingredient's chemical identity — its hazard profile from published classifications and regulatory status — not the safety of any product it appears in.

Regulation

No restrictions found. 1,2,3-Propanetriol, homopolymer, (9Z,12R)-12-hydroxy-9-octadecenoate appears in these published regulatory listings.

  • EUEFSAEFSA opinion2 entries
    • Follow-up of the re-evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive (EFSA FAF)Source →
    • Re-evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive (EFSA ANS)Source →

Expert safety opinions

Independent scientific assessments cited by the records we hold, with the year and link where the record gives one.

  • JECFA

    Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives

    No JECFA evaluation on file.

  • EFSA

    European Food Safety Authority

    • Follow-up of the re-evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive (EFSA FAF)

      2022 · EU EFSA listing · Read the source →

    • Re-evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive (EFSA ANS)

      2017 · EU EFSA listing · Read the source →

Evidence & sources

No graded research studies for 1,2,3-Propanetriol, homopolymer, (9Z,12R)-12-hydroxy-9-octadecenoate yet. This record is compiled from the published data sources below — registries and regulatory listings, not study findings.

2 data sources

Where this comes from

  • EFSA OpenFoodTox

    regulatory · updated 2026-10-04

    Open →
  • EPA DSSTox Identifiers

    chemistry · updated 2025-12-29

    Open →

Suitability

Context-specific fit derived from published classifications and the current ingredient evidence profile.

Food use

Food-use source coverage is present in the current record.

Good fit

The ingredient appears in food-oriented source coverage or allowed-use references, which makes food use easier to support than a context with no domain signal at all.

Fragrance avoidance

No fragrance-linked caution surfaced in the current profile.

Good fit

This ingredient does not currently read as a fragrance-linked driver in the published evidence and hazard profile.