Fragrance avoidance
Nothing to weigh for this context yet.
We have no published hazard signal for this ingredient, so we cannot say how it behaves in this context — that is missing evidence, not a clean result.
- industrial
5-Benzylacyclouridine
CAS 82857-69-0
Concern score
Not assessed — no hazard data yet.
5-Benzylacyclouridine in plain language
Also known as Benzylacyclouridine · 5-BACU · 5-benzyl-1-(2-hydroxyethoxymethyl)pyrimidine-2,4-dione · Bau · 5-Benzyl-1-(2'-hydroxyethoxymethyl)uracil · 5-benzyl-1-(2-hydroxyethoxymethyl)uracil
Show all 9 names
BDBM50026387 · EBC-07821 · UNII-0H851I3O9D
We don't have a plain-language description for 5-Benzylacyclouridine yet.
- We haven't assessed a concern score for this ingredient yet.
Regulation
No restrictions found. 5-Benzylacyclouridine appears in these published regulatory listings.
- Found in consumer products
- Industrial
USEPAcommercial use observedEPA CPDat observed this chemical in 0 composition records across product categories including unclassified products.
- EPA CPDat observed this chemical in 0 composition records across product categories including unclassified products.Source →
USFDAlisted in openFDA substanceopenFDA substance registry classifies this ingredient as chemical.
- openFDA substance registry classifies this ingredient as chemical.Source →
Evidence & sources
No graded research studies for 5-Benzylacyclouridine yet. This record is compiled from the published data sources below — registries and regulatory listings, not study findings.
Where this comes from
Suitability
Context-specific fit derived from published classifications and the current ingredient evidence profile.
No signal in this context
Where it has been recorded
How often EPA CPDat has listed 5-Benzylacyclouridine in a product composition. These are source records, not Greenveil catalog products.
Named organisations
1
Found in these products
Their ingredient lists include 5-Benzylacyclouridine; each product's own rating depends on its whole formula, so it is shown on the product page, not here.
