Skip to content
  • beauty
  • cleaning
  • food

Ethyl menthane carboxamide

CAS 39711-29-0 · 60/100 · High conf.

Also registered as 1 other CAS number

39711-79-0

Ethyl menthane carboxamide chemical structure

Concern score

60/100High concern based on regulatory listings.
High confidence

Ethyl menthane carboxamide in plain language

What it is

Also known as ETHYL-2-ISOPROPYL-5-METHYLCYCLOHEXANE carboxamide · Cyclohexanecarboxamide, N-ethyl-5-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)- · N-Ethyl-2-(isopropyl)-5-methylcyclohexanecarboxamide · N-Ethyl-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexane carboxamide · N-ETHYL-4-MENTHANE-3-CARBOXAMIDE · N-Ethyl-5-methyl-2-(propan-2-yl)cyclohexane-1-carboxamide

Show all 13 names

N-ethyl-5-methyl-2-propan-2-ylcyclohexane-1-carboxamide · N-ETHYL-5-METHYL-2-(1-METHYLETHYL)-CYCLOHEXANE-CARBOXAMIDE · N-Ethyl-5-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)cyclohexanecarboxamide · N-Ethyl-p-menthane-3-carboxamide · TRPM8 agonist WS-3 · UNII-6S7S02945H · WS-3

What it does

Used in cosmetics as a tonic.

  • Tonic
  • Flavouring agent
  • Humectant
  • Fragrance
  • Flavouring
Is it a concern?
High concern: no hazard classifications on record. It is listed for cosmetic use in the EU.

Why it's flagged

EPA CPDat observed this chemical in 42 composition records across product categories including Personal care.

The score describes this ingredient's chemical identity — its hazard profile from published classifications and regulatory status — not the safety of any product it appears in.

Regulation

No restrictions found. Ethyl menthane carboxamide appears in these published regulatory listings.

Recorded in these product areas

  • Found in consumer products
  • Beauty
  • Cleaning
  • EUEFSAEFSA opinion3 entries
    • Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 86, Revision 2 (FGE.86Rev2): Consideration of aliphatic and arylalkyl amines and amides evaluated by JECFA (65th meeting) (EFSA CEF)Source →
    • Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 86, Revision 1 (FGE.86Rev1): Consideration of aliphatic and aromatic amines and amides evaluated by JECFA (65th meeting) (EFSA CEF)Source →
    • Flavouring Group Evaluation 86, (FGE.86): Consideration of aliphatic and aromatic amines and amides evaluated by JECFA (65th meeting). Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in Contact with Food (EFSA AFC)Source →
  • EUCosIngActiveListed in CosIng inventory for cosmetic use.
    • Listed in CosIng inventory for cosmetic use.Source →
  • GLOBALJECFANo safety concern at current levels of intake when used as a flavouring agentJECFA evaluation lists ADI No safety concern at current levels of intake when used as a flavouring agent. Functional class: flavouring agent.
    • JECFA evaluation lists ADI No safety concern at current levels of intake when used as a flavouring agent. Functional class: flavouring agent.Source →
  • USEPAcommercial use observedEPA CPDat observed this chemical in 42 composition records across product categories including Personal care. EPA CPDat classifies this chemical for functional uses including Humectant, Flavouring and nutrient, Fragrance.
    • EPA CPDat observed this chemical in 42 composition records across product categories including Personal care. EPA CPDat classifies this chemical for functional uses including Humectant, Flavouring and nutrient, Fragrance.Source →
  • USFDAlisted in openFDA substanceopenFDA substance registry classifies this ingredient as chemical.
    • openFDA substance registry classifies this ingredient as chemical.Source →

Expert safety opinions

Independent scientific assessments cited by the records we hold, with the year and link where the record gives one.

  • SCCS

    EU Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety

    No SCCS opinion on file.

  • CIR

    Cosmetic Ingredient Review (US expert panel)

    No CIR safety assessment on file.

  • EFSA

    European Food Safety Authority

    • Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 86, Revision 2 (FGE.86Rev2): Consideration of aliphatic and arylalkyl amines and amides evaluated by JECFA (65th meeting) (EFSA CEF)

      2015 · EU EFSA listing · Read the source →

    • Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 86, Revision 1 (FGE.86Rev1): Consideration of aliphatic and aromatic amines and amides evaluated by JECFA (65th meeting) (EFSA CEF)

      2011 · EU EFSA listing · Read the source →

    • Flavouring Group Evaluation 86, (FGE.86): Consideration of aliphatic and aromatic amines and amides evaluated by JECFA (65th meeting). Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in Contact with Food (EFSA AFC)

      2008 · EU EFSA listing · Read the source →

  • JECFA

    Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives

    • JECFA evaluation lists ADI No safety concern at current levels of intake when used as a flavouring agent. Functional class: flavouring agent.

      Year not recorded · GLOBAL JECFA listing · Read the source →

Evidence & sources

No graded research studies for Ethyl menthane carboxamide yet. This record is compiled from the published data sources below — registries and regulatory listings, not study findings.

8 data sources

Where this comes from

  • CosIng

    regulatory · updated 2026-09-23

    Open →
  • EFSA OpenFoodTox

    regulatory · updated 2026-10-04

    Open →
  • EPA Chemical and Products Database

    exposure · updated September 2018

    Open →
  • EPA DSSTox Identifiers

    chemistry · updated 2025-12-29

    Open →
  • FDA GSRS UNII

    registry · updated 2026-02-26

    Open →
  • WHO JECFA Database

    regulatory · updated 2026-10-04

    Open →
  • openFDA Substance

    registry · updated 2026-05-24

    Open →
  • PubChem Live Enrichment

    chemistry · updated 2026-05-17

    Open →
Reference links (2)
Openfda substance

millenniumchem.lookchem.com

Suitability

Context-specific fit derived from published classifications and the current ingredient evidence profile.

Food use

Food-use source coverage is present in the current record.

Good fit

The ingredient appears in food-oriented source coverage or allowed-use references, which makes food use easier to support than a context with no domain signal at all.

Fragrance avoidance

Not a strong fit for fragrance avoidance because it carries Fragrance.

Avoid

The ingredient itself is a fragrance-linked signal, so it is better treated as an avoid case when fragrance exposure is the main concern.

Where it has been recorded

How often EPA CPDat has listed Ethyl menthane carboxamide in a product composition. These are source records, not Greenveil catalog products.

Source records

42

Named organisations

6

Personal care

Typical roles

TonicFlavouring agentHumectantFragranceFlavouring
See products using Ethyl menthane carboxamide →

Catalog

Found in these products

Cosmetic and personal-care products that list Ethyl menthane carboxamide are shown first. Their ingredient lists include Ethyl menthane carboxamide; each product's own rating depends on its whole formula, so it is shown on the product page, not here.