Fragrance avoidance
Nothing to weigh for this context yet.
We have no published hazard signal for this ingredient, so we cannot say how it behaves in this context — that is missing evidence, not a clean result.
CAS 39456-82-1
57284-96-5 · 61356-48-7 · 79079-57-5 · 94556-02-2 · 727741-47-1 · 130-20-1
Concern score
Also known as Vat blue 6 · D&C Blue No. 9 · AO204 · 3,3'-DICHLOROINDANTHRONE · Carbanthrene blue · Indanthrene, 7,16-DICHLORO-
3,3'-Dichloroindanthrene · 5,9,14,18-Anthrazinetetrone, 7,16-dichloro-6,15-dihydro- · 7,16-DICHLORO-6,15-DIHYDRO-5,9,14,18-ANTHRAZINE-TETRONE · 7,16-Dichloro-6,15-dihydroanthrazine-5,9,14,18-tetrone · 7,16-dichloro-6,15-dihydro-5,9,14,18-Anthrazinetetrone · Ahcovat Blue BCF · Alizanthrene Blue RC · Blue no. 204 · C.I. 69825 · C.I. Vat Blue 6 · Carbanthrene Blue BCF · Cibanone Blue FG · Cibanone Blue GF · D and C Blue No. 9 · Dichloroindanthrone · Indanthrene Blue BCF · Navinon Blue BC · Pigment blue 64 · Paradone Blue RC · Ponsol Blue BCS · Ponsol Blue BF · Ponsol Blue BFD · Ponsol Blue BFN · Ponsol Blue BFP · Tinon Blue GF · Tinon Blue GL · Vat Bllue 6
Used in cosmetics as a colourant. CI 69825 is classed chemically as an anthraquinone colour.
EPA DSSTox provides the canonical identifier, structure, and synonym profile for this chemical.
No restrictions found. CI 69825 appears in these published regulatory listings.
No expert opinion on file for CI 69825. These are the independent scientific bodies that assess ingredients like this one; we show an opinion only when a record we hold cites it.
SCCS
EU Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety
No SCCS opinion on file.
CIR
Cosmetic Ingredient Review (US expert panel)
No CIR safety assessment on file.
No graded research studies for CI 69825 yet. This record is compiled from the published data sources below — registries and regulatory listings, not study findings.
Context-specific fit derived from published classifications and the current ingredient evidence profile.
Fragrance avoidance
Nothing to weigh for this context yet.
We have no published hazard signal for this ingredient, so we cannot say how it behaves in this context — that is missing evidence, not a clean result.