Skip to content
  • beauty

Hydrolyzed rumex crispus root extract

Concern score

Not assessed — no hazard data yet.

Hydrolyzed rumex crispus root extract in plain language

What it does

Used in cosmetics as an antimicrobial. Hydrolyzed Rumex Crispus Root Extract is the hydrolysate of Rumex Crispus Root Extract derived by acid, enzyme or other method of hydrolysis.

  • Antimicrobial
Is it a concern?
We haven't assessed a concern score for this ingredient yet. It is listed for cosmetic use in the EU.

What we know about this ingredient

Canonical ingredient record built from 1 public-source records.

Regulation

No restrictions found. Hydrolyzed rumex crispus root extract appears in these published regulatory listings.

  • EUCosIngActiveHydrolyzed Rumex Crispus Root Extract is the hydrolysate of Rumex Crispus Root Extract derived by acid, enzyme or other method of hydrolysis
    • Hydrolyzed Rumex Crispus Root Extract is the hydrolysate of Rumex Crispus Root Extract derived by acid, enzyme or other method of hydrolysisSource →

Expert safety opinions

No expert opinion on file for Hydrolyzed rumex crispus root extract. These are the independent scientific bodies that assess ingredients like this one; we show an opinion only when a record we hold cites it.

  • SCCS

    EU Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety

    No SCCS opinion on file.

  • CIR

    Cosmetic Ingredient Review (US expert panel)

    No CIR safety assessment on file.

Evidence & sources

No graded research studies for Hydrolyzed rumex crispus root extract yet. This record is compiled from the published data sources below — registries and regulatory listings, not study findings.

1 data source

Where this comes from

  • CosIng

    regulatory · updated 2026-09-23

    Open →

Suitability

Context-specific fit derived from published classifications and the current ingredient evidence profile.

Fragrance avoidance

Nothing to weigh for this context yet.

No signal in this context

We have no published hazard signal for this ingredient, so we cannot say how it behaves in this context — that is missing evidence, not a clean result.