Skip to content
  • beauty

Polygonum cuspidatum root extracellular vesicles

Concern score

Not assessed — no hazard data yet.

Polygonum cuspidatum root extracellular vesicles in plain language

What it does

Used in cosmetics as a skin-conditioning agent.

  • Skin conditioning
Is it a concern?
We haven't assessed a concern score for this ingredient yet. It is listed for cosmetic use in the EU.

What we know about this ingredient

Canonical ingredient record built from 1 public-source records.

Regulation

No restrictions found. Polygonum cuspidatum root extracellular vesicles appears in these published regulatory listings.

  • EUCosIngActivePolygonum Cuspidatum Root Extracellular Vesicles are the extracellular vesicles released into and isolated from the growth media removed from cell cultures of the roots of Polygonum cuspidatum. The accepted scientific name for Polygonum cuspidatum is Fallopia japonica. For further information about botanical nomenclature, consult the section on Botanicals in "Regulatory and Ingredient Use Information."
    • Polygonum Cuspidatum Root Extracellular Vesicles are the extracellular vesicles released into and isolated from the growth media removed from cell cultures of the roots of Polygonum cuspidatum. The accepted scientific name for Polygonum cuspidatum is Fallopia japonica. For further information about botanical nomenclature, consult the section on Botanicals in "Regulatory and Ingredient Use Information."Source →

Expert safety opinions

No expert opinion on file for Polygonum cuspidatum root extracellular vesicles. These are the independent scientific bodies that assess ingredients like this one; we show an opinion only when a record we hold cites it.

  • SCCS

    EU Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety

    No SCCS opinion on file.

  • CIR

    Cosmetic Ingredient Review (US expert panel)

    No CIR safety assessment on file.

Evidence & sources

No graded research studies for Polygonum cuspidatum root extracellular vesicles yet. This record is compiled from the published data sources below — registries and regulatory listings, not study findings.

1 data source

Where this comes from

  • CosIng

    regulatory · updated 2026-09-23

    Open →

Suitability

Context-specific fit derived from published classifications and the current ingredient evidence profile.

Fragrance avoidance

Nothing to weigh for this context yet.

No signal in this context

We have no published hazard signal for this ingredient, so we cannot say how it behaves in this context — that is missing evidence, not a clean result.