Skip to content
  • beauty

Rice bran wax amidopropyl dimethylamine

Concern score

Not assessed — no hazard data yet.

Rice bran wax amidopropyl dimethylamine in plain language

What it does

Used in cosmetics as a hair conditioner. Rice Bran Wax Amidopropyl Dimethylamine is the amidoamine.

  • Hair conditioning
Is it a concern?
We haven't assessed a concern score for this ingredient yet. It is listed for cosmetic use in the EU.

What we know about this ingredient

Canonical ingredient record built from 1 public-source records.

Regulation

No restrictions found. Rice bran wax amidopropyl dimethylamine appears in these published regulatory listings.

  • EUCosIngActiveRice Bran Wax Amidopropyl Dimethylamine is the amidoamine that conforms generally to the formula, where RCO- represents the acyl groups derived from Oryza Sativa (Rice) Bran Wax.
    • Rice Bran Wax Amidopropyl Dimethylamine is the amidoamine that conforms generally to the formula, where RCO- represents the acyl groups derived from Oryza Sativa (Rice) Bran Wax.Source →

Expert safety opinions

No expert opinion on file for Rice bran wax amidopropyl dimethylamine. These are the independent scientific bodies that assess ingredients like this one; we show an opinion only when a record we hold cites it.

  • SCCS

    EU Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety

    No SCCS opinion on file.

  • CIR

    Cosmetic Ingredient Review (US expert panel)

    No CIR safety assessment on file.

Evidence & sources

No graded research studies for Rice bran wax amidopropyl dimethylamine yet. This record is compiled from the published data sources below — registries and regulatory listings, not study findings.

1 data source

Where this comes from

  • CosIng

    regulatory · updated 2026-09-23

    Open →

Suitability

Context-specific fit derived from published classifications and the current ingredient evidence profile.

Fragrance avoidance

Nothing to weigh for this context yet.

No signal in this context

We have no published hazard signal for this ingredient, so we cannot say how it behaves in this context — that is missing evidence, not a clean result.