Skip to content
Saving recent analysis
Pousses de bambou en tranche aigre-doux
Plant Based Foods And Beverages · 6900956250686

Pousses de bambou en tranche aigre-doux

Greenveil's read: consider avoiding. Food health high · 1 additive of concern (Aspartame).

Food health
High
Chemical concern
Not assessed

Allergens

  • Sesame

Declared on pack via Open Food Facts · updated 23 Mar 2026

Why it's rated this way

1 additive on this label is on our additives-of-concern list.

  1. AspartameModerate concernSweetener; classified as possibly carcinogenic, though the evidence is contested and intake-dependent.
    What it is
    Its role isn't recorded in our data yet.
    Why it's flagged
    Sweetener; classified as possibly carcinogenic, though the evidence is contested and intake-dependent.
    Regulatory basis
    Greenveil's curated additives-of-concern list, which cites the authority behind each entry.
    How sure we are
    High confidence. Matched by the additive code declared on the label.

A food's rating also reflects nutrition (Nutri-Score) and processing (NOVA); the additives above are the ingredient-level part of it.

Ingredients

  • Bamboo shoot82%No flag
  • Salt10%No flag›
  • Colza oil4%No flag›
  • Sesame oil2%No flag›
  • Chili pepper1%No flag›
  • Sugar0.2%No flag›
  • Flavour enhancer0.2%No flag
  • 1 e6210.2%No flag
  • Acid0.2%No flag›
  • E3300.2%No flag
  • Preservative0.2%No flag
  • E2020.2%No flag
  • Sweetener0.2%No flag
  • E9510.2%Moderate

    Sweetener; classified as possibly carcinogenic, though the evidence is contested and intake-dependent.

Show original label text

Pousses de bambou 82%, sel, huile de colza, huile de SÉSAME, huile de piment, sucre, exhausteur de goût: 1 E621, acidifiant: E330, conservateur: E202, édulcorant: E951.

Alerts

Declared allergens

This product declares Sesame.

Declared on pack via Open Food Facts · updated 23 Mar 2026

Food health

Nutrition profile and additives of concern

Contains additive of concern
  • AspartameSweetener; classified as possibly carcinogenic, though the evidence is contested and intake-dependent.

Per-ingredient concern · chemical identity, not food safety

What drives this

1 moderate · 2 low · 3 not assessed

3 of 6 ingredients not yet assessed · Show all

Trust & sources

Where this product data comes from

How we assembled this record: source coverage, image cache state, review state, and the active product version.

Image cache

Greenveil proxy cache

Asset write on fetch

Ingredient content

Normalized label parsed

10 items

Your context

Through your lens

Everyday use

A balanced day-to-day read across overall concern and fit.

Change lens

Recent scans

See all

Products you open appear here on this device.