Image cache
Greenveil proxy cache
Asset write on fetch
Sunflower seeds
Greenveil's read: consider avoiding. Food health high · 1 additive of concern (Aspartame).
- High
Allergens
No allergens listed for this product in our data yet — check the pack.
Checked against the Open Food Facts record · updated 1 Apr 2026
Why it's rated this way
1 additive on this label is on our additives-of-concern list.
AspartameModerate concernSweetener; classified as possibly carcinogenic, though the evidence is contested and intake-dependent.
- What it is
- Its role isn't recorded in our data yet.
- Why it's flagged
- Sweetener; classified as possibly carcinogenic, though the evidence is contested and intake-dependent.
- Regulatory basis
- Greenveil's curated additives-of-concern list, which cites the authority behind each entry.
- How sure we are
- High confidence. Matched by the additive code declared on the label.
Ingredients
- Ds53.8%No flag
- Spicet11.5%No flag
- Asparare5.8%No flag
- Ingredies2.9%No flag
- Sunto Ingridies2.9%No flag
- Ges de toumesol1.4%No flag
- Set0.7%No flag
- Papa me0.2%No flag
- 100 avec coquem Su70 m C0 g with shells0.2%No flag
- Artificial flavour Sucralo<0.1%No flag
- 79 110<0.1%No flag
- 10 gaver co jes<0.1%No flag
- Arome artifice Asparta Best befo eilleur av phenylalanine<0.1%No flag
- L'aspartame content de la em alanine<0.1%No flag
- So he ack the big Vos du sac oduct of Cuit de la Cana<0.1%No flag
- Aspartame (E951)Moderate
Sweetener; classified as possibly carcinogenic, though the evidence is contested and intake-dependent.
Show original label text
ds, Salt, Spicet, Asparare(100 mg Ingredies: Sunto Ingridies: Ges de toumesol, Set, Epices, Papa me (100 mg/100 avec coquem Su70 m C0 g with shells), Artificial flavour Sucralo (79 110/10 gaver co jes) Arome artifice Asparta Best befo eilleur av phenylalanine. L'aspartame content de la em alanine. So he ack the big Vos du sac oduct of Cuit de la Cana
Food health
Nutrition profile and additives of concern
Contains additive of concern
- AspartameSweetener; classified as possibly carcinogenic, though the evidence is contested and intake-dependent.
Per-ingredient concern · chemical identity, not food safety
Chemical identity has not been assessed for this ingredient yet.
Alternatives
No lower-concern alternatives are available for this product yet.
Trust & sources
Where this product data comes from
How we assembled this record: source coverage, image cache state, review state, and the active product version.
Trust & sources
Where this product data comes from
How we assembled this record: source coverage, image cache state, review state, and the active product version.
Ingredient content
Normalized label parsed
14 items
Your context
Recent scans
See allProducts you open appear here on this device.