Skip to content
Saving recent analysis
Tentation Pâtissière Pomme façon Tatin (0% MG)
YoplaitDairies · 3329772123739

Tentation Pâtissière Pomme façon Tatin (0% MG)

Greenveil's read: consider avoiding. Food health high · 3 additives of concern.

Food health
High
Chemical concern
Not assessed

Allergens

  • Dairy
  • Egg
  • Gluten

Declared on pack via Open Food Facts · updated 2 Mar 2026

Why it's rated this way

3 additives on this label are on our additives-of-concern list.

  1. AspartameModerate concernSweetener; classified as possibly carcinogenic, though the evidence is contested and intake-dependent.
    What it is
    Its role isn't recorded in our data yet.
    Why it's flagged
    Sweetener; classified as possibly carcinogenic, though the evidence is contested and intake-dependent.
    Regulatory basis
    Greenveil's curated additives-of-concern list, which cites the authority behind each entry.
    How sure we are
    High confidence. Matched by the additive code declared on the label.
  2. CarrageenanMinor concernDegraded carrageenan, and in some animal/in-vitro studies food-grade carrageenan, are linked to intestinal inflammation; human evidence is limited and contested.
    What it is
    Its role isn't recorded in our data yet.
    Why it's flagged
    Degraded carrageenan, and in some animal/in-vitro studies food-grade carrageenan, are linked to intestinal inflammation; human evidence is limited and contested.
    Regulatory basis
    Greenveil's curated additives-of-concern list, which cites the authority behind each entry.
    How sure we are
    High confidence. Matched by the additive code declared on the label.
  3. Acesulfame KMinor concernSweetener; broadly assessed safe but some consumer-avoidance and limited animal-study questions.
    What it is
    Its role isn't recorded in our data yet.
    Why it's flagged
    Sweetener; broadly assessed safe but some consumer-avoidance and limited animal-study questions.
    Regulatory basis
    Greenveil's curated additives-of-concern list, which cites the authority behind each entry.
    How sure we are
    High confidence. Matched by the additive code declared on the label.

A food's rating also reflects nutrition (Nutri-Score) and processing (NOVA); the additives above are the ingredient-level part of it.

Ingredients

  • Lait écrémé à base de poudre de lait53%No flag
  • Skimmed milk25.3%No flag
  • Apple8%No flag›
  • Skimmed milk powder5.4%No flag
  • Glucose fructose syrup2.7%No flag
  • Biscuit1.8%No flag
  • Biscuit1%No flag
  • Egg0.4%No flag›
  • Wheat flour0.2%No flag›
  • Salt<0.1%No flag›
  • Butter0.1%No flag›
  • Caramel · E1500.8%No flag
  • Gélatine · E4280.4%No flag
  • Flavouring0.4%No flag
  • Modified corn starch0.4%No flag›
  • Thickener0.4%No flag
  • E4070.4%Low

    Degraded carrageenan, and in some animal/in-vitro studies food-grade carrageenan, are linked to intestinal inflammation; human evidence is limited and contested.

  • Caramelised sugar0.4%No flag
  • Sweetener0.4%No flag
  • E9500.4%Low

    Sweetener; broadly assessed safe but some consumer-avoidance and limited animal-study questions.

  • E9510.4%Moderate

    Sweetener; classified as possibly carcinogenic, though the evidence is contested and intake-dependent.

  • Lactic ferments0.4%No flag
Show original label text

_Lait_ écrémé à base de poudre de _lait_, _lait_ écrémé, pomme 8 %, poudre de _lait_ écrémé, sirop de fructose-glucose 2,7 %, biscuit (sucre, _oeuf_, farine de _blé_, sel, _beurre_), caramel 0,8 %, gélatine, arômes, amidon transformé de maïs, épaississant : E407, sucre caramélisé, édulcorants : E950, E951, ferments lactiques.

Alerts

Declared allergens

This product declares Dairy, Egg, Gluten.

Declared on pack via Open Food Facts · updated 2 Mar 2026

Food health

Nutrition profile and additives of concern

Contains additive of concern
  • AspartameSweetener; classified as possibly carcinogenic, though the evidence is contested and intake-dependent.
  • CarrageenanDegraded carrageenan, and in some animal/in-vitro studies food-grade carrageenan, are linked to intestinal inflammation; human evidence is limited and contested.
  • Acesulfame KSweetener; broadly assessed safe but some consumer-avoidance and limited animal-study questions.

Per-ingredient concern · chemical identity, not food safety

What drives this

1 low · 1 not assessed

1 of 2 ingredients not yet assessed · Show all

Trust & sources

Where this product data comes from

How we assembled this record: source coverage, image cache state, review state, and the active product version.

Image cache

Greenveil proxy cache

Asset write on fetch

Ingredient content

Normalized label parsed

15 items

Your context

Through your lens

Everyday use

A balanced day-to-day read across overall concern and fit.

Change lens

Recent scans

See all

Products you open appear here on this device.